论文部分内容阅读
构建科学、客观、易判的土地市场化测度方法,有助于理解和分析我国土地资源配置的时空差异。本文在归纳总结已有测算方法的基础上,提出价款加权修正宗数比重测度法和实际-理想价款比值测度法,并以2000年-2009年中国土地市场化发展为实证,比较不同方法的特征、适用范围、结果的共性和差异。研究结果表明,2000年-2009年中国土地市场化指数呈现震荡上升的态势,2006年前后土地市场化指数较大幅度的增长;宗数比重测度法和面积比重测度法仅考虑了完全市场下的土地供应,不适用于土地市场化的专题研究;静态系数宗数比重测度法适用于短时间序列的研究,而价款加权修正宗数比重测度法适宜于较小尺度、土地供应类型趋于一致的区域研究。各供地类型的市场化权重需考虑历年供地类型的实际效果,从土地资本显化视角出发的实际-理想价款比值测度法可以更为客观、直接的反映土地市场化程度。
It is helpful to understand and analyze the spatial and temporal differences in the allocation of land resources in our country by establishing a scientific, objective and easily judged measure of land market. Based on the summarization of the existing measurement methods, this paper proposes the method of weighted proportion-weighted correction and the actual-ideal ratio method, and takes the development of China’s land marketization as an example from 2000 to 2009 to compare the characteristics of different methods , The scope of application, the commonalities and differences of results. The results show that from 2000 to 2009, China’s land market index showed an upward trend of concussion, and the index of land marketization increased significantly before and after 2006. The number-weighted measure method and area proportion measure method only take into account the total market The supply of land is not suitable for the special research on the marketization of land. The measure of the proportion of the static coefficient is suitable for the study of short time series, while the method of the proportion-weighted measure of weighted-weighted correction is suitable for the smaller scale and the types of land supply tend to be consistent Regional studies. The market-based weight of each type of land needs to consider the actual effect of the type of land supplied over the years. The actual-ideal ratio of value to measure method can reflect the degree of land marketization more objectively and directly from the perspective of land capital.