论文部分内容阅读
读了邱学华老师的《为“应用题”正名》和《中小学数学》(小学版)编者语《数学教育安全吗——由“应用题”被除名想到的》这两篇文章,感触最深的有两点:一是两位数学教育专家敢说实话、追求真知的精神,他们的见解直指数学新课程设计及其实施过程中存在的真实问题,观点鲜明,说理有据;二是“应用题”和“解决问题”之间的是是非非竞已让一线数学教师纠结不已达十年之久却仍迟迟得不到有效化解,由此造成的负面
Read Qiu Xuehua’s “for” application title “correct name” and “primary and secondary mathematics” (elementary school) editor of “math education safety you - by ” application title “deny think of these two articles , The deepest feelings of two points: First, two math education experts dare to tell the truth, the pursuit of truth-seeking spirit, their opinions directed at the new mathematics curriculum design and implementation of the real problems that exist in the process, distinct perspectives, justified evidence; Second, the problem between ”problem solving“ and ”problem solving" is that the first-line mathematics teachers have been tangled for more than ten years and still have not been able to effectively resolve the negative result.