论文部分内容阅读
本文以《塔纳赫》为基础,将“新译本”“恢复本”置于与原文以及与“和合本”的对比中,探讨圣经汉译运动试图回归或恢复原文的意义在何种意义上可以达成。本文仅从正典以及宗教核心观念等两个方面给出自己的探讨和回答,认为就信仰对象、释经以及实践而论,三个汉译本受到译不准原则的限制而不可能达到百分之百地传达原文的意思。因此,本文认为每部汉译本都试图推陈出“新”或“恢复”原文的意思,在这种情况下,每部译本都是新译本,每部译本都是恢复本。
Based on Tanah, this article compares the translation of the original version with the original text and the version of the original text, and explores whether the Chinese translation of the Bible attempts to return to or restore the original text Meaning in what sense can be reached. This article only gives its own discussion and answer from two aspects: the concept of the canon and the core of religion, and holds that the three Chinese versions are limited by the principle of translation and can not reach 100% The original meaning. Therefore, this paper argues that each Chinese translation tries to deduce the original meaning of “new” or “restored”. In this case, each translation is a new translation, and each translation is a restoration.