论文部分内容阅读
作为责任编辑,对于围绕《学术腐败批判》的讨论,我理应和大家一起开诚布公地交流意见。我认为,虽然《批判》一书存在这样那样的不足之处甚至是缺点(某些缺点也有我本人的原因,后面我将具体说明),但从总体上我们应当肯定。毕竟该书对近些年来学界的大案要案作了较为系统的清理。在此以前,虽然杨玉圣、葛剑雄、曹树基、伍铁平等学界诸先生一以贯之地进行着学术打假,并高举学术打假的大旗,但是相对于庞大的学术队伍,他们的力量确实显得极为单薄。更为重要的是他们只是通过一篇篇
As a responsible editor, I should like to discuss with everyone openly and honestly about the discussion around the “Critique of Academic Corruption.” I think that although there are some shortcomings or even shortcomings in the “Critique” book (some of the shortcomings have their own reasons, I will explain later), but overall we should be sure. After all, the book made a systematic clean-up of the major cases in the academic field in recent years. Prior to this, although Mr. Yang Yusheng, Ge Jianxiong, Cao Shuji and Wu Tiesheng and other academics consistently conducted academic crackdowns and held high the banner of academic crackdown, their power indeed seemed extremely meager compared with the huge academic team. More importantly, they just passed an article