论文部分内容阅读
以前人们在批评国有企业弊端时,往往强调体制落后,其实体制相对来说是较为容易变更的,但这并不一定带来效益的上升或止住滑坡,因为在发达国家其企业体制更加先进和丰富,却每年也有上万公司破产;在一些经济欠发达国家和地区(包括中国的一些落后地区),人们也为企业体制的设计或改造费了九牛二虎之力,却并没有收到预想中的效果。其实企业效益不好,体制不能承担全部责任,更具决定性的因素还在于产业结构是否符合市场需求。国资的进退自如体现了有所为有所不为,其目的都是为了实现国资增值。国际经贸界已发现,中国大陆的国有企业尤其是大型国有企业,在产品包括服务产品的设计与创新方面,具有很强的竞争力。近年来,国有企业的强大技术力量和营销力量发挥了威力,为国资在海内外市场的增值起到了战略性的积极作用,甚至在某些领域催生了新的市场结构,显然,在技术和设计创新带动产业和市场创新方面,国资的竞争力也是一流的。
People in the past criticized the shortcomings of state-owned enterprises, tend to emphasize the backward system, in fact, the system is relatively easier to change, but that does not necessarily result in increased efficiency or stop the landslide, because of its enterprise system in developed countries and more advanced Rich, but every year there are tens of thousands of companies bankruptcy; in some economically less developed countries and regions (including some backward areas in China), people also for the design of the enterprise system or make unremitting efforts, but did not receive Expected effect. In fact, the effectiveness of enterprises is not good, the system can not assume full responsibility, the more decisive factor lies in whether the industrial structure meets market demand. The ease and weakness of the state-owned assets can be explained by the fact that what they did and what they did was for the purpose of increasing the value of state-owned assets. International trade and economic circles have found that state-owned enterprises in mainland China, especially large state-owned enterprises, are highly competitive in the design and innovation of products, including service products. In recent years, state-owned enterprises strong technical strength and marketing power of the power play, as the value of state assets in overseas markets has played an active role in strategic, in some areas even spawned a new market structure, apparently, in technology and design Innovation drives industry and market innovation. The competitiveness of state-owned assets is also top-notch.