论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨宫颈锥切术后病理检查和阴道镜下宫颈活检病理诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变的临床价值。方法:选取我院在2012年10月-2016年10月期间,收治的98例宫颈上皮内瘤变患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,对宫颈锥切术后和阴道镜下活检的相关资料进行总结,并统计数据,最终讨论影响两者符合率的相关因素。结果:宫颈锥切术后和阴道镜下宫颈活检病理诊断结果相对比,两者相符的为68例,11例升级,19例降级。结论:单纯的依据阴道镜下宫颈活检的结果对临床上宫颈上皮内瘤变的诊治进行指导有一定的局限性,但宫颈锥切术宫颈活检既可以对患者进行一定治疗,有对诊断提供参考依据,具有一定临床使用价值。
Objective: To investigate the clinical value of pathological examination of cervical conization and colposcopic biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Methods: The clinical data of 98 patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia who were treated in our hospital from October 2012 to October 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The data of cervical conization and colposcopy biopsy were analyzed retrospectively Summary, and statistics, the final discussion of the factors that affect the compliance rate between the two. Results: Cervical conization and colposcopic biopsy under the pathological diagnosis of the relative results, the two were consistent with 68 cases, 11 cases of escalation, 19 cases of degeneration. Conclusion: Based on the results of colposcopy biopsy alone, the clinical diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia has some limitations. However, cervical conization cervical biopsy can not only treat the patients but also provide reference for the diagnosis Based on, with a certain clinical value.