论文部分内容阅读
首段提出批驳的对象“黛玉心胸狭隘、小性儿、爱出风头”。后文从三个方面分析批判“对黛玉大大的误会”:第一,列举形似“心胸狭隘”、实为“维护自尊心”的事例。“对周瑞家送来的宫花不满”——这是黛玉“寄居在声势显赫的荣国府”的特殊处境使然。第二,列举大气的事例。“香菱想学诗,黛玉热情指导”——这是黛玉“单纯得就像一颗水晶,晶莹剔透”。第三,辩证持论。“人既有优点,也有缺点”——“黛玉那些所谓‘心胸狭隘、小性儿、爱出风头’的事,既反映出黛玉的优点,也折射出她的不足”。此文卒章颇有意味——借文学作品人物说事。
The object of the first paragraph proposed by the refutation was “Saiyu’s narrow-mindedness, small sexuality, love of the limelight”. The following text analyzes critique from three aspects: “The big misunderstanding to Daiyu ”: First, it lists examples of “minor-minded ”, and “maintaining self-esteem”. “The dissatisfaction with the palace flowers sent by Zhou Ruijia” - This is the special situation of Saitama’s “hosting in the prestigious Rongguo House”. Second, enumerate examples of the atmosphere. “”Xiang Ling wants to learn poetry, jade jade passionate guidance“--this is the ”Jade jade“ is just like a crystal, crystal clear”. Third, dialectical hold. “People have both advantages and disadvantages.”--"Saiyu’s so-called ‘mindedness, smallness, love of the limelight’ reflects both the advantages of Saitama and its inadequacies. This article is quite meaningful - use literary characters to say things.