论文部分内容阅读
本文对《高丽史.刑法志》中所载的现已失传的《高丽律》的刑罚缺席制度作了初步的整理,并把它和《唐律》中的刑罚制度加以对比,从中发现了一些高丽王朝在吸收先进的唐代法律文化时所具有的一些规律性的东西。经过较为详细的比较论证,本文认为在高丽时期,韩国对中国法律文化的吸收仍然处于一种磨合阵痛期,具体表现为对《唐律》刑罚制度的极不成功的“选择”、“加工”或“改造”。这种对外来文化的加工或改造又有其极为深
This article makes a preliminary arrangement of the system of absence of punishment of the now-lost Koryo contained in the Goryeo History of Criminal Law Records and compares it with the system of punishment in the Tang Law and finds some Koryo dynasty in the absorption of advanced legal culture of the Tang Dynasty has some of the regularity of things. After more detailed comparison and argumentation, this paper argues that in the period of Goryeo Dynasty, South Korea’s absorption of Chinese legal culture is still in a period of friction and pain, which manifests itself as the extremely unsuccessful “choice” of the “Tang law” penalty system. “Processing ” or “Remodeling ”. This kind of processing or transformation of foreign culture is extremely profound