论文部分内容阅读
在知识产权侵权案件中,公证书作为证据的比例非常大,但是公证书存在瑕疵的情况也不断出现。公证机构跨执业区域受理公证业务,是否必然导致公证书无效?公证书出现程序性错误,是否可以由公证机构进行说明予以补救?法院是采信公证机构的补救说明,还是因公证书存在瑕疵而直接认定公证书为无效证据?
In the case of intellectual property infringement, the proportion of notarized certificates as evidence is very large, but there are flaws in the notarial certificates as well. Is it inevitable that the notary office will invalidate the notarial certificate when the notary office accepts the notarized business across the area of practice? Is there a procedural error in the notarial certificate that can be remedied by the notary office? Is the court a remedy for the notarization of a notary office or is there a direct defect in the notarial certificate Certification of notarized certificate of evidence?