论文部分内容阅读
质量原则是语用交际的根本原则,要求说话人不说自己认为不真实的话、不说自己没有足够证据的话。不过,这一原则在法律语篇和日常语篇中的体现具有明显差异。本文对法律语篇和日常语篇进行了比较,分析了庭审转述的责任性、选择性、忠实性等方面的特征,认为庭审中各方明显的对立性和明确的目的性是这些特征的成因。
The principle of quality is the fundamental principle of pragmatic communication, requiring the speaker not to say what he or she thinks is untrue, but not to say that he does not have enough evidence. However, there is a clear difference in the expression of this principle between legal discourse and everyday discourse. This article compares the legal discourse with the daily discourse, and analyzes the characteristics of the responsivity, selectivity and loyalty of the court hearing, and concludes that the apparent antagonism and definite purpose of the court are the causes of these characteristics .