论文部分内容阅读
《明实录》是以记载明代帝王历史为中心的编年体史书,其中不乏对大臣个人事迹的描写。然观宪、孝两朝实录,其对大臣刘翊的书写却大相径庭。《明宪宗实录》所记之刘翊事迹多有缺失且不乏曲笔,《明孝宗实录》所载之刘翊小传基本符合史事却多溢美之言。这不仅关系到史官史德的问题,也与《明实录》凡例之失密切相关。因此,辨别《明实录》之失,尽可能全面、客观地还原一个真实的刘珝,有利于在纷繁的史料中揭示历史事件的本来面目。
The Record of the Ming Dynasty is a chronicle of history books that records the history of the emperors in the Ming Dynasty, many of whom describe the individual deeds of ministers. However, the concept of constitution, filial piety records, its writing to Minister Liu Yi is very different. “Ming Xianzong Record,” recorded in the story of Liu Yi, there are many derelictions and many novels, “Ming Xiaozong real record” contains Liu Yi’s biography basically consistent with the history but more beautiful words. This is not only related to the issue of historiography morality, but also related to the disappearance of the “Ming Dynasty Record”. Therefore, to discern the loss of “Ming Dynasty Record” and to restore a true Liu Song as comprehensively and objectively as possible can reveal the true features of historical events in the numerous historical materials.