论文部分内容阅读
“经承旧史”是杜预《春秋》学的基本观点,认为孔子据鲁史记修成《春秋》,旧史遗文实为《春秋》主体。此与汉儒极力倡导“孔子作《春秋》立素王,为后世立法”的论调截然不同。在史料来源上,杜氏认为《春秋》专据策书,而《左传》兼取简牍,在记事上两者构成解释关系,但并非简单的一一对应。杜氏新说的形成与魏晋学术的新发展,尤其是史学化的倾向关系紧密。
“Inheriting the old history” is the basic view of Du prejudicing the theory of “Spring and Autumn”. According to Lu Shi Ji, Confucius thought it was “Spring and Autumn”. This and the Han Confucianism strongly advocate “Confucius made ” Spring and Autumn “King of the King, for later legislation ” argument completely different. On the sources of historical data, Du thought that “Spring and Autumn” should be based on the policy and that “Zuo Zhuan” should be both simple and coherent. On the memo, the two constitute an explanation relationship, but not a simple one-to-one correspondence. The new formation of Du’s new theory is closely related to the new development of Wei-Jin scholarship, especially the tendency of historiography.