论文部分内容阅读
《尼斯协定》是中国参加的一个重要协定,该协定主要是为各国商标注册提供统一的商品或服务国际分类。在中国实践中,商标审查机关和商标评审机关主要以在该协定基础上产生的《类似商品和服务区分表》为依据判定商品或服务是否类似,且几乎不突破该区分表的归类标准;而法院一般也以该《类似商品和服务区分表》为标准判定商品或服务是否类似,但时常突破该区分表的归类标准。可见,对《尼斯协定》的实施在我国商标审查、评审和诉讼中存在较大分歧。下面就这一重大实践问题进行探讨。
The Nice Agreement is an important agreement to participate in China. The agreement is mainly aimed at providing a uniform international classification of goods and services for the registration of trademarks in various countries. In the practice of China, the trademark examination authority and the trademark adjudication authority mainly determine whether the goods or services are similar on the basis of the “similar goods and services classification table” produced on the basis of the agreement, and hardly break the classification criteria of the classification table; The courts generally also judge whether the goods or services are similar on the basis of the “table of similar goods and services”, but often break the classification criteria of the classification table. Visible, the implementation of the “Nice Agreement” in China’s trademark review, review and litigation there is a big difference. The following is a discussion of this major practical issue.