论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析早期妊娠采取药物流产和人工流产终止妊娠的临床效果。方法:回顾性收集2013年1月至2016年12月在我院接受终止早期妊娠治疗的240例早期妊娠者,其中采取药物流产者104例,采取人工流产136例,采用卡方检验对比分析两种流产方法完全流产率,采用独立样本t检验比较出血时间及出血量等临床指标。结果:药物流产和人工流产两种终止早期妊娠方法完全流产率分别为84.61%(88/104)、97.05%(132/136),人工流产完全流产率优于药物流产(P<0.05);药物流产平均出血时间为(9.97±3.4)天,平均出血量为(30.68±4.8)ml,人工流产平均出血时间为(6.12±1.9)天,平均出血量为(12.14±4.7)ml。两种流产方法出血时间和出血量比较显著差别(P<0.01)。结论:终止早期妊娠采取人工流产临床效果优于药物流产,采用人工流产方法终止妊娠更安全。
Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of termination of pregnancy by medical abortion and induced abortion in early pregnancy. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to retrospectively collect 240 early pregnant women who underwent termination of early pregnancy in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2016. Among them, 104 cases of medical abortion were taken and 136 cases of induced abortion were adopted. Chi- Abortion method of complete abortion rate, using independent samples t-test bleeding time and bleeding and other clinical indicators. Results: The abortion rates of abortion and abortion were 84.61% (88/104) and 97.05% (132/136), respectively. The rate of abortion was better than abortion (P <0.05) The average bleeding time was (9.97 ± 3.4) days and the average bleeding volume was (30.68 ± 4.8) ml. The average time of induced abortion was (6.12 ± 1.9) days and the average bleeding volume was (12.14 ± 4.7) ml. The two methods of abortion bleeding time and bleeding were significantly different (P <0.01). Conclusion: The clinical effect of abortion termination of early pregnancy is better than that of medical abortion. It is safer to terminate pregnancy by artificial abortion.