论文部分内容阅读
一九七○年春,在湖南省龙山县洛塔公社这个海拔千米的土家山寨,围绕着农业生产措施问题出现了两种不同意见的激烈争论。一种意见,主张照搬平区经验,在洛塔大种双季稻,否则是右倾保守,反对科学种田。另一种意见,主张“哪个山上唱哪支歌”,能否在洛塔种双季稻,有待于进一步实验,不然脱离实际,欲速不达。面临着两种不同意见,公社党委一时作不出决断。五月十六日,我们敬爱的华国锋同志,千里迢迢,健步登上洛塔山界。这时,人们都把目光投向他,盼着对上述两种意见敲个定音锣。华国锋同志很快知道了在洛塔围绕生产措施问题展开的争论。他认为两种意见的分岐,不仅是一个生产措施问题,也是一个坚持唯物论的反映论,还是坚持唯心
In the spring of 1970, there was a fierce debate on two different opinions around the measure of agricultural production in Tujia Village, an elevation of 1,000 meters, at the Luota Commune in Longshan County, Hunan Province. One opinion advocates copying the experience of Ping District in Shuangtai, a large variety of rice in Lota, otherwise it is right-conservative and opposes scientific farming. Another opinion, advocating “which mountain singing which song”, can double crop rice in Losa, pending further experiments, or from reality, hurry up. Faced with two different opinions, the party committee of the commune made no decision. On May 16, Comrade Hua Kuo-feng, our beloved, traveled all the way to Mount Lotita. At this time, people are turning their gaze on him, hoping for a knock on the two opinions. Comrade Hua Kuo-feng soon learned of the controversy over the measures of production in Lothar. In his opinion, the disagreement between the two opinions is not only a question of measures of production, but also a theory of insistence on materialism or an idealism