论文部分内容阅读
一、两个需要商榷的意见开展林价讨论以来,有两种意见值得商榷。第一,认为只要木材提价,林业就好办。这种意见,只看到木材提价是提高或建立林价的前提,而没有注意到林价才是制订合理木材价格的科学依据,更忽视了如不以林价确立营林生产专业的经济利益、经济地位,单纯提高木材价格,会助长砍林卖钱风气的发展。一九八○年开放木材自由市场,出现议价木材,木材价格大幅度提高,竟成了云南省又一次大砍森林的原因,就是对这个意见的回答。第二,认为多收一些育林费,可以取代林价。这种看法,只看到征收数量不足的一个
One or two opinions that need to be discussed Since the discussion on forest prices, there are two kinds of opinions that are open to question. First, that as long as timber price increases, forestry can be easy to handle. This view, only to see timber price increase is the premise of raising or establishing the forest price, without noticing that the forest price is the scientific basis for setting reasonable timber prices, but also ignores the lack of forest price to establish a professional forest production economy Interests and economic status, simply raising the price of timber, will help cut the money selling forest development. The opening of the free market of timber in 1980, the bargaining of timber, and the substantial increase in the price of timber have become the reason for another chopping of forests in Yunnan Province, which is the answer to this opinion. Second, we think that it is possible to replace the forest price by paying more for raising some forestation fees. This view, only to see the lack of a collection of one