论文部分内容阅读
20世纪60年代中期以来,韩国在两个方面对我国印刷术发明权提出了挑战:一是大肆炒作出土于庆州的《无垢净光大陀罗尼经》,得出印刷术起源于韩国的结论;一是以高丽铸字印本《佛祖直指心体要节》为依据,得出金属活字发明于韩国的结论。前者,包括笔者在内的我国学界,做了大量研究工作,一致认为该经是唐代印本,印刷术只能起源于中国,而非韩国。本文就金属活字问题的来龙去脉进行追述,并做了进一步的探讨。
Since the mid-1960s, South Korea has challenged the invention right of printing in our country in two aspects. First, we must make a big stir of the “net-free Da Dori Ronny” unearthed in Gyeongju, and come to the conclusion that the printing originated in Korea The conclusion is that one is based on the text of the Buddhist scripture “Buddha directed at the heart and soul” published in Korea, and concludes that the invention of metal type in Korea. The former, including our author, has done a great amount of research work in our country’s academic circles. It is unanimously considered that the book was printed by the Tang Dynasty and that printing can only originate from China rather than South Korea. This article traces the ins and outs of the problem of metal type and makes further discussion.