论文部分内容阅读
市场或政府,这是长久以来各经济学派争论的主要命题之一。有关这一问题的争论贯穿于经济学说的整个发展历程,自由市场和政府干预这两种主张在经济思想史上此起彼落,在争论中相互促进、完善,不同学派在这一命题上形成自己的观点都有其特定的社会条件和历史背景。以经济思想史为鉴,得出市场完全程度和政府干预程度存在反比关系这一结论,而完全市场或完全政府的政策选择都是极端的、不符合现实经济体客观条件的。在当今社会环境和经济条件下,经济当局在引导和管理宏观经济时,应当根据自身的经济环境以及社会发展程度,在市场和政府之间选择恰当的均衡点。
Market or government, which is one of the main propositions of the debate in various economic schools for a long time. The debate on this issue runs through the entire development process of economic theory. Both the free market and government intervention rise and fall one after another in the history of economic thought, promote and perfect each other in the debate, and different schools have formed themselves on this proposition Have their own specific social conditions and historical background. Taking the history of economic thought as a reference, we can draw the conclusion that there is an inverse relationship between the degree of market integrity and the level of government intervention. However, the choice of policy in a complete market or a complete government is extreme and does not conform to the objective conditions of the real economy. In today’s social environment and economic conditions, when guiding and managing the macroeconomy, the economic authorities should choose an appropriate balance between the market and the government according to their own economic environment and the level of social development.