论文部分内容阅读
法官不受任何影响和干扰依法办案,是神圣职责;以自己的言行支持法院依法办案,是每个公民的责任。近来,互联网上经常有一些为犯罪嫌疑人开脱,或提前“定罪”的现象,有的甚至舆论一边倒,来势汹汹。这种试图以“舆论审判”来影响甚至左右司法审判的现象,引起了人们对于“舆论审判”和司法审判关系的深思。网络技术的迅速发展,对于实现人民群众对司法工作的知情权、参与权、表达权、监督权,推动司法改革和公正司法起到了重要作用。然而,武器越锐利,用起来就越要当心。舆论表达在发挥积极作用的同时,也难免产生一些消极的东西,这些消极的
It is a sacred duty for the judge not to influence or disrupt the handling of cases according to law. It is the duty of every citizen to support the court’s handling of the case in accordance with the law by his own words and deeds. Recently, there have often been some cases of excuseing or “convicting” suspects on the Internet, and some have even pushed the media sideways and menacing. This kind of attempt to influence the judicial judicatory even with “public opinion judgment ” has aroused the people ’s pondering over the relationship between the “public opinion trial” and the judicial trial. The rapid development of network technology has played an important role in realizing people’s right to know, participate, express, supervise and promote judicial reform and fair judiciary. However, the sharper the weapon, the more careful it is to use it. While the expression of public opinion plays an active role, it also inevitably produces some negative things. These negative