论文部分内容阅读
由仓修良先生主编的《中国史学名著评介》出版了。这部书的编纂,开始于一九八八年那个特定的时期。那时,“文化热”的浪潮正席卷中国大地。在这个浪潮中,存在着一股全盘否定中国传统文化的逆流,这股逆流,也波及到了对于中国传统史学的评价。诚如仓修良先生在《前言》中所指出的那样:有一些人,“对中国封建时代究竟有多少种史书体裁、每种史体的长短得失还没有搞清楚,就草草地撰写文章,作了所谓(中西史学的)比较后,便对中国传统史学的史体横加指责。”作为一名严肃的、有正义感的史学工作者,仓修良先生对于这种“既对不起祖宗又对不起子孙的历史虚无主义”的作法感到愤慨,责无旁贷地认为有必要对此加以抵制和批判。“为了帮助大家对祖国传统史学作进一步的了解和研究,以弘扬优秀的民族文化,为建设社会主义精神文明服务”(《前言》),仓修良先生约请了全国有专门研究的历史学家对一些史学名著撰写书评,于是有了这部煌煌百十万言的史学著作的问世。
Published by Mr. Cang Xiu-liang editor of “China’s history masterpiece review.” The compilation of this book began in that particular period in 1988. At that time, the tide of “cultural fever” was sweeping the land of China. In this wave, there is a counter-current that totally negates the traditional Chinese culture. This counter-current also affects the evaluation of the traditional Chinese history. As Mr. Cang Xiu-liang pointed out in the “Preface”: Some people, “How many kinds of history books are available in the feudal era of China, and the length and the shortness of each history have not been clarified, After making the so-called comparison of Chinese and Western historiography, he criticized the history of traditional Chinese historiography. ”As a serious historian with a sense of justice, Mr. Cang Xiu-liang is very much in favor of this“ Indignant at the history nihilism of descendants, ”it is duty-bound to consider it necessary to resist and criticize this. “In order to help everyone to further understand and study the traditional Chinese history of the motherland in order to promote the excellent national culture and serve the construction of socialist spiritual civilization” (“Foreword”), Mr. Cang Xiu-Liang has invited historians Write a book review of some famous works of history, so with the advent of this hundred million words of Huang Huang history books.