论文部分内容阅读
以往语言模糊性的论争多集中在“语义三重模型”对语义模糊性根源的解释力之上。语言哲学、范畴理论和行为主义心理学等揭示出语义模糊性产生于思维对客体的反映与语言对思维的表达的过程中。“反映”与“表达”的过程即为范畴化过程;关联性原则推动与制约下的范畴化过程则是模糊化过程。语言对客观世界的指谓没有绝对的精确,精确只是相对而言,这一观点已成共识。换言之,只要人类思维反映客体和语言表达思维的过程不中断,模糊化就不会停止。模糊化是思维的需要也是表达的需要,存在于“反映”与“表达”过程的探究中。
In the past, the controversy of language ambiguity mostly focused on the explanatory power of the “semantic triple model” to the root of semantic ambiguity. Linguistic philosophy, category theory and behaviorism psychology reveal that the semantic fuzziness arises from the reflection of the object on the object and the expression of the language to the mind. The process of “reflection” and “expression” is the process of categorization; the process of categorization promoted and restricted by the principle of association is the process of fuzzification. The language is not absolute accuracy of the target of the objective world, but only relatively speaking, this view has become a consensus. In other words, as long as human thought reflects that the process of object and language expression of thinking is not interrupted, fuzzification will not stop. The obfuscation is the need of thinking and the need of expression, and exists in the investigation of the process of “reflecting” and “expressing”.