论文部分内容阅读
《电影评介》第九期刊发的《据『史』论『片』不足取》一文,说理不多,冷言不少,认为一些报刊采访『历史』中健在长者,说三道四,中国的历史故事片有被『难』瘫的危险,甚至是中国电影『悲哀』之一,实在荒谬之至。天下之大难保没有人把历史教科书和历史故事片混同审度。然观众水平尽管『低下』,要求历史片需『无一字无出处,无一处无来历』的人恐怕难寻。倒是大多数编导,为了真实性,不惜化费功夫,查证资料,求教长者,例如《血战台儿庄》片中几乎所有的情节,细节都来自文献资料和参战者的笔录(见《电影评介》第九期》艺术≠历史》一文)。一部影片,就是由无数个细节组成的。哪些细节该取哪些该舍,见仁见智,可以讨论,把它们一律斥
The article entitled “According to the history of the film”, the article entitled “Insufficient films” published in the ninth issue of “Film Review,” said few things and made a lot of cold remarks about some newspapers who interviewed the elders who are now living in the “history” It is absurd that one of the historical feature films of the story is “hard” paralyzed, even one of the “sad” Chinese films. No one in the world can guarantee that history textbooks and historical stories are mixed. However, despite the “low level” of the audience, it is hard to find the film that requires the historical film to be “without a word and without any origin.” For the sake of authenticity, however, he did not hesitate to waste time and money to check information and seek advice from elders, such as Almost all the episodes of “Bloodsail Taierzhuang”. The details are from the sources in the literature and the transcripts of the participants (see “Film Review” Nine “art ≠ history” article). A movie, is composed of numerous details. Which details should be taken from the house, a matter of opinion, you can discuss, put them all denounced