论文部分内容阅读
社会信息化的发展使得公民对公共文化服务的需求有了大幅度的增长,从法律层面对文化权利进行保护显得十分必要。文章采用文献调研和比较分析法,总结我国公共文化立法的“非系统性”、“区域先行”和“行政化强”的特点,分析了国外“引导推动”、“委托代理”和“分权制衡”三种模式,从投资主体规定、管理模式、社会参与程度、法律体系系统性和法规性质五个方面对两者进行比较,并针对性的提出改进方向和建议。
The development of social informatization has made citizens’ demand for public cultural services have greatly increased. It is very necessary to protect the cultural rights from the legal aspect. By using the methods of literature investigation and comparative analysis, this paper summarizes the characteristics of “non-systematicness”, “regional precedence” and “administrative strongness” of public cultural legislation in our country, “Proxy ” and “decentralization and checks and balances ” three models, from the provisions of the main investment, management, social participation, the legal system of the nature of the system and the nature of the statutory comparison of the two, and targeted Put forward the direction and suggestions for improvement.