论文部分内容阅读
文人的矫情,多表现在多愁善感,无事生非,喜欢小题大做。养了一只鹤死了,未能假鹤之志完满自己“吾翔寥廓耶”之夙愿,因而,几位道士聚在一起,很是伤感,锦缎裹了鹤身,埋了它之后,仍心心念念。一位叫华阳真逸的道士便写下一文,叫《瘗鹤铭》。于是,种下一阕绵延了千余年的哀伤,留下了一缕千余年的悬念,同时也悬起一段千余年的笔墨官司。毋庸置疑,《瘗鹤铭》是篇好文。除了文章格局与气度之外,文采上丝毫不弱于王逸少的《兰亭序》。当然,文章义理开局不同,或不可比。一宇宙宏观,一鸡零狗碎;一大题大作,一小题大做。先不说文章,说说
Literati’s hypocritical, more performance in the sentimental, non-existent, like a fuss. Raising a crane died, the Fake crane not complete his own “I Xiang boundless profile ” of the wish, therefore, several priests together, it is sad, damask wrapped crane body, buried it , Still miss heart. A man named Hua Yang really Yi wrote a text, called “Heming Heming.” As a result, I planted the next 阕 stretches more than a thousand years of sadness, leaving a ray of thousands of years of suspense, but also suspended a period of more than a thousand years of ink lawsuit. Needless to say, “Crane Heming” is a good article. In addition to the article pattern and tolerance, literary grace is not weaker than Wang Yi less “Orchid Pavilion order.” Of course, the article starts different, or not comparable. A macro-macro, a mess; a big problem, a big problem. Do not talk about the article, talk about