论文部分内容阅读
附录一刘大钧致国民政府财政部长函稿○○○○赐鉴: 迳陈者:国民经济研究所本系端纳先生与弟所合办,从事经济研究及调查之工作,已历数年。月前端纳先生曾表示,近年彼为他项职务所稽,对该所该社之工作,未能随时指导,不如加以结束,藉以节省公款。弟对研究工作虽感甚浓厚之兴趣,且认为研究与调查之所得,亦可供政府设计之参考,然以下列数种原因,对端纳先生之主张,不能不表示同意: 一、该两机关皆系端纳先生所创办,在工库制度未施行之前,经费亦系以彼名义领取,列为特别费。彼既认为无维持之必要,弟自不便另持异议。二、年来各机关搜罗人才,待遇甚丰。敝所敝社经费有限,不能随时加薪,人事变迁甚繁。职员经多时之
Appendix I Liu Dajun’s Letter to the Minister of Finance of the National Government ○○○○ 鉴:: 迳 Chen: The Institute of National Economy The Department of Economic Research, co-organized by Mr. Duanna and his colleagues, has been engaged in economic research and investigation for several years. On the previous month, Mr. Tana said that in recent years, he was a prisoner for his position and was unable to provide any guidance on the work of the agency. It is better to put an end to saving public funds. Although her brother is very interested in the research work and considers that the income from research and investigation is also available to the government for design, he may not but give his consent on the following arguments: First, the two The authorities are all founded by Mr. Duanna. Prior to the implementation of the work-warehouse system, the funds were also collected in the name of him as a special fee. He considers that there is no need to maintain his own inconvenience to hold another objection. Second, the various agencies over the past collecting talent, very rich treatment. Our club limited funds, not at any time raise the salary, personnel changes are very complex. After a long time staff