论文部分内容阅读
目的探索尿动力学检查在女性压力性尿失禁中的诊断价值。方法确诊为女性压力性尿失禁患者60作为观察组,体检的健康人中选出60例作为对照组,对两组受检对象进行尿动力学检查,对比分析两组的尿动力学检查结果。结果观察组中有81.67%的患者尿流曲线正常,而对照组则100.00%尿流曲线正常。在尿动力学参数上,观察组的最大尿流量率(Qmax)、平均尿流量率(Qave)、最大尿道压(MUP)、最大尿道闭合压(MUCP)与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论尿动力学检查在女性压力性尿失禁的临床诊断上具有显著价值,且检查结果还能指导临床治疗方案的制定。
Objective To explore the diagnostic value of urodynamic examination in female stress urinary incontinence. Methods 60 female patients with stress urinary incontinence were selected as the observation group and 60 healthy subjects were selected as the control group. Urinary dynamic test was performed on the two groups of subjects, and the results of urodynamic examination were compared between the two groups. Results In the observation group, 81.67% of the patients had normal urinary flow curve, while 100.00% of the control group showed normal urinary flow curve. In terms of urodynamic parameters, the Qmax, Qave, MUP and MUCP in the observation group were significantly different from those in the control group (P <0.05) P <0.05). Conclusion Urodynamic examination has significant value in the clinical diagnosis of female stress urinary incontinence, and the examination results can guide the formulation of clinical treatment plan.