论文部分内容阅读
传统文学研究与批评模式是遵循“作家与作品”的中心地位。60年代末接受美学大师提出作品的意义来源于两个方面:一是作品本身,二是读者的赋予。而在解构主义看来,语言的终极意义和结构也被一种无限性所包围。对语言的解读是无止境的,而且解构阅读是多元的,不可终极的。在接受理论中,文本因读者的不同而具有不确定的终极意义。在解构主义中,文本也是无法得到某一确定的意义,多中心论成为其消解的手段。总体来说,多中心意味着无中心,而多主题意味着无主题。从此意义来讲,接受理论是作为解构主义思潮的一部分而存在。
The mode of traditional literature research and criticism follows the central position of “writer and work ”. In the late 1960s, the significance of accepting works by aesthetics master came from two aspects: one is the work itself, and the other is given by readers. In the deconstruction view, the ultimate meaning and structure of language are also surrounded by an infinite. Interpretation of language is endless, and deconstruction reading is diverse, not the ultimate. In the theory of acceptance, the text has the ultimate meaning of uncertainty due to the different readers. In deconstruction, the text can not get a certain meaning, polycentricism as its means of digestion. In general, polycentric means non-centered, while multi-topic means no topic. In this sense, the theory of acceptance exists as part of the deconstructionist ideology.