论文部分内容阅读
日本东北大学教授野家启一和大阪大学教授鹫田清一在日本《情报知识的含义》(1999年版)上撰文指出,在这20世纪行将结束的时候,各个领域都在进行回顾100年的活动。尤其是经过战后50年,关于“战争”的记忆成为最重要的焦点。同时也是争论点之一。德国的“历史学家的争论”、关于斯米索尼安博物馆展出原子弹爆炸资料的争论、由教科书记载“从军慰安妇”发端的日本的历史修正主义论争等等,20世纪给人类留下的伤痕现在还在隐隐作
In his article “The Meaning of Information Knowledge” (1999 Edition) published by Japan’s Tohoku University professor Nakasaki Keisuke and Nakahashi Karasaki, a professor at Osaka University, pointed out that in the 20th century approaching, various fields are under review for 100 years activity. Especially after 50 years of the war, the memory of “war” has become the most important focus. It is also one of the points of contention. The controversy of historians in Germany, the controversy over the atomic bombings at the Smythe Suanneng Museum, the historical revisionist controversy in Japan starting with textbooks on the so-called comfort women’s comfort, etc., left to mankind in the 20th century The scars are still faint