论文部分内容阅读
随着2000年3月10日最高人民法院《关于执行(中华人民共和国行政诉讼法)若干问题的解释》(以下简称《若干解释》)的出台,交通事故责任认定的行政可诉性应是不争的问题。但在司法实践中,有观点认为,最高人民法院和公安部联合发文规定单独对交通事故责任认定不服诉至人民法院提起行政诉讼的,人民法院不应受理;公安部也以批复认为交通事故责任认定是鉴定结论,不是具体行政行为;从事公安交通管理的不少同志也认为,没有法律规定对交通事故责任认定不服可以列入行政诉讼受案范围。在《若干解释》出
With the promulgation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues concerning the Implementation of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as “Certain Interpretations”) on March 10, 2000, the administrative suitability for the identification of a traffic accident liability should not be an issue The problem. However, in judicial practice, the view is that the Supreme People’s Court and the Ministry of Public Security jointly issued a separate statement on the responsibility for identifying traffic accidents not appealing to the people’s court to bring an administrative lawsuit, and the people’s court should not accept it. The Ministry of Public Security also approved that the responsibility for traffic accidents Identification is the conclusion of the appraisal, not a specific administrative act; many comrades engaged in public security traffic management also believe that there is no legal requirement to recognize the responsibility of traffic accidents can be included in the scope of administrative proceedings. In “a few explanations” out