论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者在临床中接受常规干预与肺康复护理干预的效果差异.方法:入选我院治疗的慢阻肺加重期结合呼吸衰竭患者80例进行研究.常规组采取药物结合无创呼吸机进行治疗,实验组结合肺康复护理.对比两组患者的肺功能、呼吸困难指标以及生活质量指标.结果:在患者接受干预之前肺功能评价结果相差不大,P＞0.05;在接受干预后研究足的肺功能指标、呼吸困难评分、生活质量评分、改善明显且优于常规组,P＜0.05.结论:针对慢阻肺患者提供肺康复护理具备较高的临床价值,可以有效提高患者的肺功能,有利于患者生活质量的改善,值得推广.“,”Objective: To study the effect difference between routine intervention and pulmonary rehabilitation nursing intervention in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods: 80 patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined with respiratory failure were selected for study. The routine group was treated with medicine combined with noninvasive ventilator, while the experimental group was treated with lung rehabilitation nursing. The lung function, dyspnea index and quality of life index of the two groups were compared. Results: Before the intervention, the results of pulmonary function evaluation were similar (P ＞ 0.05). After receiving the intervention, the lung function index, dyspnea score and quality of life score of the research foot improved obviously and were better than those of the routine group (P ＜ 0.05). Conclusion: It is of high clinical value to provide pulmonary rehabilitation nursing for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which can effectively improve the pulmonary function of patients and improve their quality of life.