论文部分内容阅读
在美国,法院和政府机构是评估生命价值的主要部门,其使用的工具分别是侵权法和监管政策。桑斯坦考察了统计学上生命的价值与统计学上生命年的价值之间,以及支付意愿、接受意愿和质量调整生命年之间的关系,并得出以下结论,即最好的方法可能是使用支付意愿来衡量统计学上生命年的价值,然后在合适的情形下做出分配或其他调整。他讨论的问题都是货币化评估生命价值的核心问题,对于研究美国生命价值评估体系并对我国司法和行政实践具有主要的理论意义。
In the United States, courts and government agencies are the major departments that assess the value of life and use tools such as tort law and regulatory policy, respectively. Sunstein examines the relationship between the values of statistical life and the statistically significant years of life, as well as the relationship between willingness to pay, willingness to accept, and quality adjusted life years, and concludes that the best method may be Use the willingness to pay to measure the value of a statistically significant year of life and then make allocations or other adjustments where appropriate. The questions he discusses are all the core issues in the assessment of the value of life for the purpose of studying the life value assessment system in the United States and having the main theoretical significance for our judicial and administrative practice.