论文部分内容阅读
在近年来有关林纾的大量研究中,研究者以接近历史复杂性、触摸历史现场的态度,把林纾从新文学史单一、固化的形象中解脱出来。这位曾经被“五四”新青年嘲讽、揶揄、批判的守旧派、封建遗老、反动派,被逐渐正面化为一位“感时伤乱,呼唤救国”的热血文人②,一位堪称“新文学的不祧之祖”的文学翻译家③,一位与“五四人”共享同一精神文化链条的“狂人”④。但是在这些纠正、还原之余,也难免出现新的偏差和
In a large number of studies on Lin Shu in recent years, the researcher freed Lin Shu from the single and solid image of the history of new literature by approaching the historical complexity and touching the historical scene. The old school, the feudal elder and the reactionary who were ridiculed, coveted and criticized by the “May Fourth” new youth have gradually been turned into a blood-blooded writer who “feels hurt and calls for saving the nation.” A literary translator who is the “ancestor of the new literature” ③ a “madman” who shares the same spiritual and cultural chain with “May Fourth People”. However, these corrections and reductions will inevitably lead to new divergences