论文部分内容阅读
在理论与实践中,关于集资诈骗罪的争论多由非法占有目的引发。虽然最高法的司法解释不断突破传统理论,呈现对非法占有目的认定的扩大化,但其概念应作严格的限缩解释。“以非法占有为目的”存在于金融诈骗罪、取得型财产犯罪中,起到表明行为的社会危害程度,区分罪名的重要作用。关于非法占有目的,存在着罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪界限模糊,以及在司法认定中被弱化的问题。为此,可双管齐下,立法上坚持先民后刑原则,增设“拒不返还”要件;司法上坚持主客观相一致原则,树立从严从细的推定理念,避免仅以单一事实认定非法占有目的的存在。
In theory and practice, the controversy over the crime of fund-raising and fraud is mostly caused by the purpose of illegal possession. Although the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Law constantly breaks the traditional theory and presents an enlargement of the accusation of the purpose of illegal possession, its concept should be strictly restricted and narrowed. “For the purpose of illegal possession ” exists in the crime of financial fraud, acquisition of property crimes, played a social hazard that behavior, the important role of the distinction between charges. With regard to the purpose of illegal possession, there exists the problem of sin and non-sin, the ambiguity of the crime and the limitation of sin, and the problem of being weakened in the judicial determination. To this end, we can work in a two-pronged approach, adhering to the principle of amending the ancestors after punishment in legislation, adding the elements of “refusing to return”; judicial adherence to the principle of consistent subjectivity and objectivity, establishing a strict and presumptive philosophy, Possession of the purpose of existence.