论文部分内容阅读
社会主义社会的生产,虽然本质上是使用价值的生产,但社会主义經济仍然具有商品的性质。在全民所有制經济和集体所有制經济之间、在国营企业之间、以及消費品在国家职工中的分配,都存在着商品交換。研究这客观存在的必然性,研究它对現存生产方式的适应性,对于利用商品、商品交換及其有关諸范疇为社会主义建設服务,以及对于进一步探討将来商品交換消亡的具体途徑,都有重大的实踐意义。因而,它也同时是政治經济学理論研究的重要課題。但是,在馬克思主义經济学界中,对于社会主义社会存在商品交换的問題,还有不同的意見,其中特别关于社会主义全民所有制經济内部的交換。例如,駱耕漠同志认为,在全民
Although the production of a socialist society is essentially value-added production, the socialist economy still has the nature of a commodity. There is a commodity exchange between the ownership by the whole people and the economy under collective ownership, the distribution among state-owned enterprises, and the distribution of consumer goods among state workers. To study the inevitability of this objective existence, to study its adaptability to existing modes of production, and to the use of the exchange of goods and commodities and their related fields to serve the socialist construction, and to further explore the specific ways in which the exchange of commodities in the future will die out, Practical significance. Therefore, it is also an important issue in the study of political economy at the same time. However, in the field of Marxist economics, there are still different opinions on the existence of the commodity exchange in the socialist society, with particular regard to the exchange within the socialist ownership of the whole people. For example, Comrade Luo Gemo believes that all people