论文部分内容阅读
新近一期的《文艺争鸣》刊载了洪子诚的文章,对《材料与注释》一书的“自序”部分予以补充说明。洪子诚在“自序”中说,这本书“最初的想法是,尝试以材料编排为主要方式文学史叙述的可能性,尽可能让材料本身说话……”“尽量让材料本身说话”——但是材料本身不会说话。假设把《材料与注释》看作另类,或“亚”文学史叙述,那么,就不可能没有勾勒趋势、提供判断和结论。材料的选取、编排、注释,都是写作者的支配、处理。近些年在文学写作与研究中,有“原生态”“还原”“原汁原味”“回到历史自身”等词语——它们大致从1980年代末开始流行。有文学史意识的人
A recent issue of “Literature and Art Contest” published an article by Hong Zi-cheng, supplementing the “Preface” section of “Materials and Notes”. Hong Zi-cheng said in his “Preface” that the original idea was to try to arrange materials as the main way of describing the possibility of literary history, to make the materials themselves as possible as possible ... “” Try to make the material itself Talk “- but the material itself can not speak. Assuming that material and commentary are to be treated as alternative or ”literary history“, then it is impossible not to outline trends and provide judgments and conclusions. Selection of materials, orchestration, annotation, are the author’s disposal, processing. In recent years, in literary writing and research, there have been phrases such as ”original ecology“, ”restoring“, ”authenticity“ and ”returning to history itself", which have generally become popular since the late 1980s. A literary history of people