论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨根管治疗和干髓术用于牙髓炎治疗的临床治疗方法与临床疗效。方法选取2011年1月至2013年12月来我院治疗的120例牙髓炎患者作为研究对象,随机将患者分试验组和对照组,各60例,试验组患者采用根管治疗法,对照组患者采用干髓术方法治疗,比较两组患者的治疗效果以及治疗方法。结果试验组患者总有效率为98.3%;对照组痊愈患者总有效率为95.0%,差异有统计学意义P<0.05。结论应用根管治疗牙髓炎在临床上虽然方法较为复杂,操作较为困难,但是效果较好,而且对于患者术后的生活质量和恢复都较好,对于临床上治疗牙髓炎的患者采用根管治疗的方法明显优于干髓术的治疗。
Objective To investigate the clinical treatment and clinical curative effect of root canal therapy and stem-marrow surgery for pulpitis. Methods A total of 120 patients with pulpitis who were treated in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2013 were selected as study subjects. The patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 60 cases each. The patients in the experimental group were treated with root canal therapy, The patients in the group were treated with dry-cell method, and the treatment effect and treatment of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate was 98.3% in the experimental group and 95.0% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions The clinical application of endodontic treatment of pulpitis is complicated and difficult to operate. However, the effect is better, and the quality of life and recovery of postoperative patients are better. For the clinical treatment of pulpitis, Tube treatment is significantly better than the treatment of stemmed.