论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】我国现行刑法中的没收制度包括作为刑罚方法的没收财产刑和并非刑罚方法的对案件所涉特定物品的处理,在具体适用时,要进行区分并坚持罪责刑相适应原则。■案号一审:(2010)虹刑初字第256号二审:(2010)沪二中刑终字第521号【案情】被告人高丹于1994年5月被任命为大连海运(集团)公司驻北京联络处主任。1995年2月,大连海运(集团)公司投资设立北京柯瑞莎
The purpose of the referee The current system of confiscation of criminal law in our country, including confiscation of property as a punishment method and not the penalty method of handling specific cases of the case, in the specific application, to distinguish and adhere to the principle of crime and punishment to adapt. ■ Case No. First instance: (2010) Hongjian Chu Zi No. 256 Second instance: (2010) Shanghai Erzhongzhengzi No. 521 【Case】 Defendant Gao Dan was appointed as Dalian Maritime (Group) Company in May 1994 Beijing liaison office director. In February 1995, Dalian Shipping (Group) Company invested in Beijing Kerui Sha