论文部分内容阅读
岁月更迭,新旧交替。十二月,这个辞旧迎新的时间之窗,就这样悄无声息地来到了。回首来时路,我们曾有过怎样的耕耘?怎样的收获?展望未来,我们将要付出怎样的努力?怎样的探索?高考,作为广受社会各界关注的第一大考,多年来从未停止过改革与探索的脚步。从考试科目设置改革、考试内容改革,到以“发挥地方资源优势、体现地方特色”为主旨的分省命题改革,高考进行了多角度、多层面的尝试与探索。那么,高考改革到底走过了一个怎样的轨迹?其对中学教学又产生了怎样的影响?对此,我们有必要加以认真的回顾与理性的思考,追寻高考改革的足迹,以便更好地把握高考改革乃至教育改革的方向。为此,我们请来了各个学科的教师参加我们的讨论。他们是教学改革的践行者,是高考的研究者,他们的观点应当是科学的理性的思考;他们站在高考的前沿,与考生及家长的距离最近,因而从某种角度来说,他们的观点也反映了民声与民意。当然,其中一些不同看法,也仅代表他们自己的看法,供读者参考。
Years change, old and new alternate. In December, this window of time for the old and new arrival came so quietly and silently. Looking back, what kind of work have we done, what kind of harvest we have, what kind of efforts we will have to look forward to in the future, what kind of exploration, and how to explore the college entrance examination, as the first exam that has received wide public attention, has never stopped over the years. The pace of reform and exploration. From the reform of examination subject setting, the reform of examination content, to the provincial proposition reform with the purpose of “giving play to local resource advantages and reflecting local characteristics”, the college entrance examination has carried out multiple angles and multi-level attempts and explorations. So, what kind of trajectory has the college entrance examination reform gone through and what impact has it had on secondary school teaching? In this regard, we need to seriously review and think rationally to pursue the reform of the college entrance examination to better grasp The college entrance examination reform and even the direction of education reform. To this end, we invited teachers from various disciplines to participate in our discussion. They are the practitioners of teaching reform and are the researchers of the college entrance examination. Their views should be scientific rational thinking; they stand at the forefront of the college entrance examination, and they are closest to candidates and parents, so from a certain perspective, they The viewpoint also reflects the public opinion and public opinion. Of course, some of these different opinions only represent their own opinions for the reader’s reference.