论文部分内容阅读
目前,一些基层公安机关在办理刑事案件过程中,为了查明案件事实真相,根据犯罪嫌疑人的供述,对那些无事主或案发时事主未报案的案件需要对与犯罪有关的场所进行辨认,通过辨认制作现场辨认笔录,用它来代替现场勘查笔录,笔者认为此种做法欠妥,理由如下: 勘查与辨认的内容及法律依据不同勘查是侦查人员对犯罪有关的场所、物品进行实地观察、调查和了解,以发现和收集犯罪活动所遗留下来的各种痕迹和物品及其他相关信息的一种诉讼活动。依据勘查所制
At present, in handling criminal cases, some grassroots public security organs, in order to ascertain the truth of the case and according to the criminal suspect’s confession, need to identify the crime-related places for those cases where the victim is not reported or the victim did not report the case at the time of the crime, By recognizing the production site to identify transcripts and using it instead of on-site survey transcripts, the author believes this kind of practice is not proper for the following reasons: Contents of investigation and identification and legal basis Different surveys are conducted by investigators on crime-related places and articles, Investigate and understand the lawsuit in order to detect and collect various traces and objects left over from criminal activities and other relevant information. According to the exploration system