论文部分内容阅读
[目的]探讨围绝经期宫内节育器(IUD)滞留的安全性。[方法]采用分层整群随机抽样的方法,对围绝经期IUD滞留612例和围绝经期非IUD避孕538例进行健康测量表SF-36测定、症状自评量表SCL-90测量,结果进行比较。[结果](1)SF-36健康量表分析显示:IUD组中的社会和情感因素相对危险度增加(P﹤0.05),而功能和健康因子则具有保护作用(P﹤0.05),其他因素两组间差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。(2)SCL-90心理量表分析显示:IUD组中的强迫心理、偏执和睡眠饮食相对危险度增加(P﹤0.05),而忧郁和恐惧情绪则明显低于非IUD组(P﹤0.05)。[结论]IUD组SF-36健康测试情况优于非IUD组,SCL-90心理测试情况则低于非IUD组,显示IUD滞留妇女健康状况各项目总体测试良好,而在心理健康方面存在问题,应提供支持。
[Objective] To investigate the safety of postmenopausal IUD retention. [Methods] A total of 612 cases of peri-menopausal IUD and 538 cases of peri-menopausal non-IUD contraception were measured by stratified cluster random sampling. SF-36 and SCL-90 were used to measure the results. Compare. [Results] (1) SF-36 health scale analysis showed that the relative risk of social and emotional factors in IUD group increased (P <0.05), and functional and health factors had protective effect (P <0.05). Other factors There was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). (2) SCL-90 psychometric analysis showed that the relative risk of forced psychology, paranoid and sleeping diet increased in IUD group (P <0.05), while the depression and fear mood were significantly lower than those in non-IUD group (P <0.05) . [Conclusion] The IUD group SF-36 health test is better than the non-IUD group, while the SCL-90 psychological test is lower than the non-IUD group. It shows that the overall health status of IUD stranded women is good, but there are some problems in mental health, Should provide support.