论文部分内容阅读
随着批评遗产研究的兴起,国际学界对遗产、博物馆实践进行了深刻的反思。澳大利亚国立大学劳拉简·史密斯教授认为,考古学家和其他学科的专家都需要重新审视自己在遗产实践中的角色及其学术话语带来的政治影响,倾听社区和其他利益相关者的声音;博物馆工作也应寻求与相关利益群体更深层的互动,认识到参观者往往有着复杂的身份认同与情感诉求,避免将之视为简单的被教育对象,要为他们提供激发情感共鸣和自我反思的资源;描述和探讨不同文化语境中的遗产话语是迫切需要的研究课题,亚洲的遗产活动和思维对于遗产的多样性发展具有重要意义,批评遗产研究的“批评”概念需要多元文化思考,遗产理论发展和遗产学专业教育也需要对遗产的多元化理解。
With the rise of criticism of heritage studies, international academics have conducted a profound reflection on heritage and museum practices. Professor Laura Smith of the Australian National University believes archeologists and other subject specialists need to revisit their political roles in the practice of their heritage and their academic discourse and listen to the voices of communities and other stakeholders; Museum work should also seek deeper interaction with stakeholders, recognizing that visitors often have complex identities and emotional appeals, and avoid seeing them as simple subjects to be educated, empathizing and reflecting on themselves Resources; Describing and discussing the heritage discourse in different cultural contexts is an urgent research topic. The heritage activities and thinking in Asia are of great significance to the diversity and development of the heritage. The concept of “criticism” criticizing the heritage research requires multi-cultural thinking , The development of heritage theory and heritage education also need to diversify the heritage of understanding.