论文部分内容阅读
目的：比较不同内固定方法治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。方法选取2008年4月～2015年4月于我院治疗的200例股骨粗隆间骨折患者,随机平均分为两组。观察组采用Gamma钉内固定,对照组采用动力髋螺钉(DHS)内固定。结果观察组的术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间和住院时间短于对照组,<0.05；观察组的术后并发症发生率为4.0%,低于对照组(0)；对照组术后髋关节恢复的优良率为86.0%,低于观察组(95.0%),<0.05,差异显著。结论采用Gamma钉内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折,不仅手术创伤小、安全性高、术后关节功能恢复快,而且术后并发症少。“,”Objective To compare the clinical effect of different internal fixation methods in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur. Methods 200 cases of intertrochanteric fracture patients treated in our hospital from 2008 April to 2015 April were randomly divided into two groups.The observation group was fixed with Gamma and the control group was fixed with dynamic hip screw (DHS).Results In the observation group, the amount of blood loss was less than that of the control group,the operation time and hospitalization time were shorter than the control group, <0.05, the postoperative complication rate was 4%,lower than the control group (0);the good rate of postoperative recovery of the control group was 86%,lower than the observation group (95%), <0.05,the difference was significant.Conclusion The treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with Gamma screw fixation,not only has less trauma,safety,and postoperative recovery of joint function,but also has less postoperative complications.