论文部分内容阅读
音乐评论家施瓦尔茨认为:政治和美术的易燃性的结合,近几年来一直是爆炸性的话题,然而人们却很少注意音乐与政治的相互影响,这在某种程度上反映了严肃音乐在美国文化中的地位越来越靠边站,甚至严肃音乐界的内部都有人对政治性的音乐抱怀疑态度。例如简约派的鼻祖赖克就说:“我想不出有任何重大政治变化是受艺术中的变化的影响。毕加索的《格尔尼卡》是一幅杰作,但它不能制止两个千分之一秒的狂轰滥炸。政治性音乐又在哪里造成丝毫不同的结果呢?这些全是音乐家的个人偏见。” 但是比较年轻的一些作曲家,特别是现年三十多岁的一代,不同意这种观点。而去年在基钦举行的一年一
Schwarz, a music critic, argues that the combination of the flammability of politics and fine arts has been an explosive topic in recent years, yet people pay little attention to the interplay between music and politics, which to some extent reflects serious music The position in American culture is getting more and more out of reach. Even the inside of the serious music industry is skeptical of political music. For example, Janez, the founder of Minimalism, said: “I can not think of any major political change that is affected by changes in art.” Guernica “by Picasso is a masterpiece, but it can not stop two thousandths One second of indiscriminate bombing.Why do political music bring the slightest difference? All these are the personal prejudices of musicians. ”But younger composers, especially those in their thirties, Do not agree with this view. The year in Kitchet last year