论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比全身约束法与手足约束法在预防气管插管患儿非计划性拔管的效果。方法:将2012年5月~2013年2月在我院PICU行气管插管患儿200例,随机分成实验组和对照组,每组100例,实验组采用全身约束法,对照组采用常规手足约束法,观察2组非计划性拔管的发生率。结果:实验组发生非计划性拔管发生率明显低于对照组。结论:使用全身约束法较常规手足约束法人性、舒适、简便、牢固,减轻护士的工作量及压力。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of total body restraint and hand-foot restraint in the prevention of unplanned extubation in children with endotracheal intubation. Methods: From May 2012 to February 2013, 200 children with endotracheal intubation in PICU were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 100 cases in each group. The control group was treated with general hand-foot-and-foot Constraint method was used to observe the incidence of unplanned extubation in two groups. Results: The incidence of unplanned extubation in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group. Conclusion: Compared with the conventional hand-foot restraint method, the systemic restraint method is more comfortable, simple and firm, and reduces the work load and stress of the nurses.