论文部分内容阅读
本刊1990年第3期发表的《静止的定义和分类》一文,笔者认为有不妥之处,现提出自己的一点看法,与作者商榷。一、静止的概念笔者认为,在讨论“静止”概念之前,应当明确在质点力学中,正确理解“静止”概念的最基本的理论依据是什么?毫无疑问,经典力学体系的核心是牛顿运动三定律,因此,回答力学问题的最基本的依据只能是牛顿运动定律。按照牛顿运动第一定律所指出的,一切
In the article “Definition and Classification of Stillness” published in the third issue of the magazine in 1990, the author believes that there is something wrong with it. Now he puts forward his own views and discusses with the author. First, the concept of quiescence The author believes that before discussing the concept of “stationary”, it should be clear in the particle mechanics, what is the most fundamental theoretical basis for correctly understanding the concept of “stationary”? There is no doubt that the core of the classical mechanics system is the Newtonian movement. Three laws, therefore, the most basic basis for answering mechanical problems can only be Newton’s laws of motion. According to the first law of Newtonian movement, everything