论文部分内容阅读
人们在选择自己的行为和行为方式时，总是以自我利益是否能够得到最大满足为第一前提条件的。信访行为人，包括信访工作人员、信访机构的行为，自然也符合这一原则。信访工作者和相关办理机构，往往对信访中出现的信访人“越级”信访现象不能理解甚至产生反感，对此我们不能简单地认为是信访工作者及其机构的认识不正确，需要辨析清楚的是：为什么“越级”那么普遍和经常？站在信访人的立场分析，这种“越级”现象产生的原因、背景是什么？是否具有应该理解和认可的“现实合理性”？
When people choose their own behavior and behavior, they are always the first prerequisite for whether their own interests can be fully satisfied. The behavior of petitioners, including petitioners, petitioners and petitions agencies naturally conforms to this principle. The petitioners and the relevant handling agencies often can not understand or even produce resentment about the “leapfrog” letters and petitions appearing in letters and visits. For this reason, we can not simply consider that the petitioners and their agencies are not well-informed and need to be clearly defined Is: Why “leapfrog” so common and often? Standing on the petitioner’s position analysis, this “leapfrog” phenomenon, what is the background? Is there any “realistic rationality” that should be understood and recognized?