论文部分内容阅读
《文选》选入王巾的《头陀寺碑文》的原因 ,学术界长期并无异说。自 (日本 )清水凯夫从刘孝绰主选《文选》的角度解释以后 ,有关此文的评价及入选《文选》的原因遂成问题 ,并引发争议。顾农、屈守元等先生曾就此问题撰文与清水先生商榷 ,就一些方面提出了富有意义的论证 ,但仍有一些问题尚待澄清。本文拟就《头陀寺碑文》的主题、艺术水准及其与《文选》的关系发表一些看法。
The reason why “Wenxuan” chose Wangtu Temple’s “inscriptions of Tiaotuo Temple” has long been no different from the academic circles. Since (Japan) Kiyosumi Shimizu explains from the perspective of Liu Xiuzhuo’s “Selected Works of Wenxuan”, the reasons for this article’s assessment and the inclusion of “Selected Works of Wenxuan” have become problematic and controversial. Gu Nong, Qu Shuan Yuan and other gentlemen once discussed this issue with Mr. Shimizu, and made meaningful arguments on some aspects. However, some problems remain to be clarified. This article intends to make some comments on the theme of Tia Tuo Temple inscriptions, artistic standards and their relationship with “anthologies”.