论文部分内容阅读
有这样一幅漫画:一个孩子拿着满分试卷,得到了表扬,而另一个拿着55分试卷,则受到批评。后来,得到满分的孩子拿着98分的试卷受到了批评,得了55分的孩子拿到61分得到了表扬。由此,我看到了一个问题:人们对于不同事物的评判标准,差别过大。显然,这是不正确的。在应试教育的今天,优秀的人才被要求保持优秀,不允许出现半点差错。成绩差的,便被要求力争上游,进步便是好事。可是,孰能无错?为什么优秀的人才就不允许出错?稍差一点的便可以放宽要求?评判存在这么大的差距,似乎有点不合人情。因材施教虽然好,但要注意尺度。每个时期,每个领域都有
There is such a comic: a child holding a full test paper, was praised, while the other holding a 55-point papers, was criticized. Later, the full score of children’s papers with a score of 98 was criticized, and the score of 55 when children got 61 marks was praised. As a result, I see a problem: people’s judgments on different things, the difference is too large. Obviously, this is not correct. In the exam-oriented education today, good people are required to maintain good, not allowed to make the slightest mistake. Poor grades, they were asked to strive for the upper reaches, progress is a good thing. However, what is right and wrong? Why is not good people allowed to make mistakes? A little less will be able to relax the request? Judging the existence of such a big gap, it seems a bit unacceptable. Individualized, though good, but pay attention to the standard. Every period, every field has