论文部分内容阅读
新课改自1999年酝酿以来,已经历17年的实践历程,然而新课改在取得成绩的同时却面临着诸多挑战:部分学校应考试需要随意压缩甚至取消社会实践课程、综合活动课程等;教学过程仅仅为对话而对话,为活动而活动等;学习方式仍然以接受学习为主。为此,我们应该重返中国新课改实践生态,分析其所依存的历史条件。一、回归课程改革纲要《基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)》强调了课程管理者的教育部、各级地方行政主管
The new curriculum reform has experienced 17 years of practice since it was brewed in 1999. However, the new curriculum reform faces many challenges while achieving results. Some schools need to squeeze or cancel social practice courses and comprehensive activity courses at examinations at will. The teaching process is only for dialogues and dialogues, activities for activities, etc .; learning methods are still mainly to accept learning. Therefore, we should return to the practice ecology of new curriculum reform in China and analyze the historical conditions on which it depends. First, the return to curriculum reform outline “Basic Education Curriculum Reform (Trial)” emphasizes the course manager of the Ministry of Education, local administrative authorities at all levels