论文部分内容阅读
二十世纪的中国史学 大体有两大说史系统。一是顺着说,也就是顺着中国历史自身发展的逻辑说中国历史,究明真相,进矣哉,阐明其自有之文化动源。一是横入说,即以西方的种种工场、主义、思想、观点,横插进来,说中国历史。其胜义,或可提供一种诠解。其劣义,则在套解、图解。 说史的史家,可谓如林似云。而评说这些如林似云的史学人物,我这里介绍两付眼光。一付是香港中文大学许冠三的《新史学九十年1900——》。许是胡适弟子殷海光的学生,许书可说是新文化运动的眼光,或“中国自由主义”的眼光。推崇许书者甚众,我看有些问题。其书虽标榜“超越宗派门户,力求录实传信”,列史家六派十六人,不仅他自己“当仁不让”,而且连没有一本正式史著的逻辑学家殷海光只因是他的老师也专列一节,可史学著作等身的吕思勉,钱穆却
Chinese historiography in the twentieth century generally has two major historical systems. First, go along, that is, according to the logic of the development of Chinese history, say Chinese history, clarify the truth, carry forward, and clarify its own cultural resources. First, cross the border, that is, with all kinds of Western workshops, doctrines, ideas, ideas inserted in and say Chinese history. Its triumph, or can provide a interpretation. Its inferior, then set solution, graphic. Said the history of the historian, can be described as Lin like clouds. Commenting on these historians and people like Lin Yuxun, I introduce two pairs of vision here. A pair is the Chinese University of Hong Kong Sam Hui “new history ninety years 1900 -.” Xu Xu Haiguang disciples Yin Haiguang students, Xu book can be said that the New Culture Movement’s vision, or “Chinese liberalism” perspective. Respect Xu book who is public, I see some problems. Although his book boasts of “surpassing sectarian portals and seeking to record and transmit creations,” six historians and sixteen not only did he “do his part” but also did not have a formal historian Yin Haiguang just because of him The teacher also devoted himself to a section, historiography, etc. Lu Si Mian, Qian Mu